Skip to content

Forward Share Network

CHRO Expert Operator – Twanya Hood Hill

Get Matched in 48 Hours →
Matched in 48 Hours STAR-Verified Track Record No Placement Fee
200+Expert Operators
48 hrsMatch Guarantee
214STAR-Verified
$0Placement Fee

A fractional CHRO provides executive-level People & Talent leadership for the window between a company outgrowing its HR generalist and being ready to absorb the cost and timeline of a full-time CHRO search. Twanya Hood Hill has served in that seat at multiple VC-backed companies – running compensation design, hiring architecture, manager development, and culture infrastructure at full executive scope, with engagement structures that fit the company's operating stage rather than a full-time leadership cost.

When a company outgrows its people function faster than it can hire for it

The Series B inflection point is where most companies first experience the gap: the company has grown past the capacity of a generalist HR function, but the board and CEO are not yet aligned on the timing or scope of a CHRO hire. In the meantime, compensation structures are inconsistent across teams, manager quality varies dramatically, performance management exists on paper but not in practice, and the hiring pace required by the operating plan is straining whoever owns recruiting. These are CHRO-level problems. They compound when left unaddressed – a compensation framework built inconsistently creates equity perception problems that take two years to fix, and a manager development gap shows up in voluntary attrition that looks like a culture problem but is actually a management problem.

What a fractional CHRO engagement covers – and what it does not

Twanya operates as CHRO across four domains in a fractional engagement. First, compensation architecture: building or rebuilding the comp framework with consistent banding, equity philosophy, and performance-linked variable structure. Second, hiring architecture: defining the hiring process for each role tier, building the interview structure and evaluation criteria that produce consistent decisions, and establishing the sourcing strategy for the roles the operating plan requires. Third, manager development: building the management cadence, feedback infrastructure, and performance conversation structure that produces consistent management quality across the org. Fourth, culture infrastructure: the all-hands cadence, employee listening program, and the culture practices that make the company's stated values operational rather than decorative. A fractional CHRO does not handle compliance, payroll, or benefits administration – those stay with the HR team or a PEO.

The cost of waiting – what the CHRO gap costs companies that defer it

Companies that defer CHRO-level people leadership typically surface three compounding costs. Attrition: without consistent management quality and a clear performance culture, voluntary attrition runs 3–5 percentage points above what a well-managed people function produces. Hiring efficiency: without a defined hiring architecture, time-to-fill extends and offer acceptance rates decline – each point of decline in offer acceptance represents significant recruiting cost. Compensation liability: inconsistent compensation banding creates legal exposure and, more practically, the internal equity perception problems that trigger departure conversations among the highest performers who compare notes. Twanya has seen these costs multiple times. The fractional CHRO engagement is typically cheaper by 40–60% than the compounded cost of those three problems over 18 months.

A STAR case from the Forward Share Ventures network

Situation: A Series B company at $12M ARR, 60 employees, first Head of People had just departed after 14 months, board-mandated CHRO hire with a 6-month search timeline. The company needed CHRO-level leadership immediately to manage a compensation framework overhaul (40% of the team was outside band), a performance management system build before the next review cycle, and an engineering hiring wave of 12 roles planned to open in 60 days.

Result: Twanya joined as fractional CHRO within 10 days of the Head of People's departure. In the first 30 days she completed a compensation audit and identified 24 employees outside band, built a remediation plan that addressed the highest-risk employees first, and launched the engineering hiring architecture with interview kits and evaluation rubrics for each of the 12 roles. Over 90 days she built the performance management framework and ran two cycles of manager calibration sessions. Engineering hiring time-to-fill improved from 78 days to 44 days. When the full-time CHRO joined at month 5, the people function was operational rather than broken.

Forward Share Ventures expert operators are selected from a verified STAR Portfolio™ of documented outcomes. Cases are shared with client permission.

"The people function is the operating system of the company. When it is broken or absent, every other function runs slower, costs more, and produces inconsistent results. You cannot build a great product with a great team if the infrastructure for building and keeping that team does not exist."

– Twanya Hood Hill, People & Talent Expert Operator, Forward Share Ventures

Frequently asked questions

What does a fractional CHRO do vs. a Head of People?

A Head of People is typically a senior individual contributor or manager who owns the day-to-day operation of the people function – running recruiting, managing HR processes, and executing the people programs the leadership team has defined. A CHRO operates at the executive decision-making layer – defining compensation philosophy, organizational design, talent strategy, and the people function's roadmap, then partnering with the CEO and board on the people decisions that affect the company's trajectory. A fractional CHRO provides the executive layer without the full-time cost or the 4–6 month search timeline. Most companies between 40 and 150 employees need CHRO-level thinking 2–3 days per week, not 5 – which makes a fractional model more economically appropriate than a full-time hire.

When do I need CHRO-level leadership at a Series B company?

Four signals indicate CHRO-level leadership is needed. First, compensation inconsistency is creating retention risk – employees are comparing notes and finding wide variation in comp for similar scope and performance. Second, hiring is a bottleneck – the operating plan requires 20+ hires in 12 months and no defined hiring architecture exists. Third, management quality varies significantly across the org – some teams are high-performing and others are struggling, and the difference is management, not the work. Fourth, voluntary attrition is above 15% annually – which typically indicates a combination of management quality gaps and compensation issues that require executive intervention, not HR program fixes. If two or more of these are present simultaneously, a CHRO-level engagement is appropriate.

How do I build a compensation framework without a dedicated comp team?

A compensation framework at the Series B stage does not require a dedicated comp team – it requires three inputs and a decision process. The three inputs are: market data (Radford, Levels.fyi, or Carta for equity benchmarks, depending on roles), a role leveling framework (a written description of each level and its scope, decision authority, and output expectations), and an equity philosophy (how the company thinks about equity grants relative to cash comp, and how that changes by level and function). With those three inputs, you can build a compensation band for every role in the company and a process for evaluating new hires and existing employees against those bands. The process takes 4–6 weeks to build correctly. The alternative – making comp decisions without a framework – is cheaper in week one and expensive for the following two years.

What is the engagement structure for a fractional CHRO?

A fractional CHRO engagement with Twanya typically runs on a 2–3 day per week commitment for an initial 3-month engagement, with renewal options based on what the company needs after the first quarter. The first month is diagnostic: an audit of the current people function across compensation, hiring, management, and culture. The second and third months are build and execute: working through the priority areas identified in the audit while maintaining the company's active hiring and people operations. After 3 months, the engagement either transitions to a lighter advisory cadence (appropriate when the full-time CHRO search is in progress), extends at the same intensity (appropriate when the search is delayed or on hold), or concludes with a handoff package for the incoming CHRO.

How quickly can a fractional CHRO make an impact at a company in people function crisis?

The first 30 days produce two tangible outputs even in a people function crisis: a prioritized audit of the highest-risk situations (the comp outliers most likely to leave, the open roles most critical to the operating plan, the management gaps most likely to produce attrition), and a 90-day plan that sequences remediation based on that risk assessment. Immediate stabilization – meaning the situations most likely to produce urgent departures or legal exposure are addressed – typically happens within 45–60 days. Systemic improvement (consistent compensation banding, defined hiring architecture, operating management cadence) takes the full 90-day initial engagement. Companies in acute crisis should not expect a 30-day fix; they should expect a 30-day stabilization followed by a 60-day systematic build.

Get an operator read on your situation

Twenty minutes with an expert operator who has been here before. No prep needed – bring the situation as it is. You will leave with a clear read on the gap and a concrete next step.

Get an operator read →

No prep needed. 20 minutes. You'll leave with a clear read on the gap.

Ready to match? No prep needed. 20 minutes.

Get Matched in 48 Hours →

How It Works

01

Tell us your gap

20-minute read with Vish. We map the function, stage, and urgency — no deck required.

02

We match in 48 hours

You receive 1–3 STAR-verified operators matched to your exact situation — reviewed and accountable.

03

Deploy in days

No contract lock-in. Start with a sprint or ongoing engagement. Cancel any time.

How We Compare

The honest breakdown — what separates a Forward Share expert operator from your other options.

Criteria FSV Expert Operator Staffing Agency Full-Time Hire
Time to deploy48 hours3–6 weeks3–6 months
CommitmentCancel anytimeContract-locked12+ months
Track recordSTAR-verified outcomesResume-screenedReferences only
Cost modelEngagement-based, no fee20–30% placement feeBase + equity + benefits
QualityTop 5% — curated from 400+Available candidatesBest hire at this stage
RiskLow — no long-term lock-inMedium — fee non-refundableHigh — mis-hire is 1.5–2× salary

Find Your Expert in 48 Hours.

No prep needed. 20 minutes. You'll leave with a clear read on your gap — and the right operator to close it.

STAR-Verified · No Placement Fee · Cancel Anytime